Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with a global score of 90.8 against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE body is noticeably newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. LG V35 ThinQ and Galaxy S20 FE both count with extremely similar CPUs, both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy S20 FE features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels resolution, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.