Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a little bit better than the Motorola edge, having a 90.8 score against 89.6. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while Motorola edge has Android 10 version, providing a couple additional features and performance tweaks. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and Motorola edge were released only 5 months apart, Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's body is just a little heavier but somewhat thinner.
Galaxy S20 FE has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola edge. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher screen density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Motorola edge takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola edge also counts with a bigger sensor and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Motorola edge counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB, the Motorola edge also has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola edge and Galaxy S20 FE count with incredibly similar batteries duration.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S20 FE is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.