Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Edge (2024)'s global score of 78.5. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14. The Galaxy S20 FE body is older, a bit heavier and just a little thicker than Motorola Edge (2024).
The Motorola Edge (2024) has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a just a bit worse display density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a quite larger display. Galaxy S20 FE features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S20 FE shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller sensor taking worse quality videos and photos, a lower video resolution and a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Motorola Edge (2024) has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S20 FE is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.