Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a general score of 90.8 against 78.5. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is an older, a little thicker and somewhat heavier phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE. Both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a same size screen and a higher pixel amount per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S20 FE has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 2% greater battery size.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a camera in the back with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.