Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 global score. The Galaxy S20 FE is a just a little lighter device than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but both are 0.33inches thick. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a slightly better screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a little larger display.
Galaxy S20 FE features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.