Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a 90.8 score against 83.4. The Galaxy S20 FE construction is a bit thinner and a little lighter than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it was released many years before. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a much higher video quality and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.