Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's general score of 81.9. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. The Galaxy S20 FE is a noticeably older, a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way better screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE features just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.