Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with a global score of 90.8 against 86.3. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's design is a lot older, a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bit larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a way bigger aperture for better low-light photography, a much more mega pixels camera and a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a battery duration that's very similar to the Galaxy S20 FE one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.