Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's overall score of 87.1. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is an extremely older device than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but Samsung managed to build it just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a battery life that's very similar to the battery life in Samsung Galaxy S20 FE.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.