Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Motorola Moto G 5G, having a 90.8 score against 81.5. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10. Galaxy S20 FE is a somewhat lighter and thinner device than the Motorola Moto G 5G, even though both of them were released only a few months apart.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a little greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G 5G features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Moto G 5G takes clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G 5G also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.