Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, having a 90.8 score against 82.6. Even when Galaxy S20 FE and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus were released only 3 months apart, Galaxy S20 FE is a little bit lighter and a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better display than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a little smaller screen, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit less pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S20 FE features a little faster processing unit than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Moto G 5G Plus captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing worse quality images and videos and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a larger aperture and a way better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.