Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 overall score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) were only released with a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 FE has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density.
Moto G Stylus (2021) features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video and a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 FE features a little better battery duration than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.