Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is slightly better than the Moto G100, having a 90.8 score against 88.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE construction is thinner and just a little bit lighter than Moto G100, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference. Both devices we compare here have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Motorola Moto G100 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Moto G100 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Moto G100 and Samsung Galaxy S20 FE feature very similar screens, although the Moto G100 also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520px, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a little larger screen.
The Moto G100 has a much better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, a much higher 5760x3240 video quality and a much better 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Moto G100 features a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto G100 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Moto G100 has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.