Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is just a bit better than the Moto G200 5G, with a global score of 90.8 against 86.2. These phones have the same Android 11 OS. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is an older cellphone than Moto G200 5G, but it is a bit thinner and just a little lighter anyway. Galaxy S20 FE has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% greater battery size. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a way higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.