Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-01-28 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto G41's general score of 79.1. Galaxy S20 FE's construction has the same thickness than the Motorola Moto G41, but it is just a little heavier. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better screen than Moto G41, because although it has a little lower screen pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a quite larger display. The Moto G41 has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G41 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a little bit better camera than Moto G41, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a much worse 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Moto G41 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.