Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Motorola Moto G51 5G, having a 90.8 score against 77.8. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is older than Motorola Moto G51 5G, it's body is a little lighter and just a bit thinner. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better processing power than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and higher video frame rates. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G51 5G, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Moto G51 5G features a little better battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.