Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | -- |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Motorola Moto G60s, having a score of 90.8 against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE construction is lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G60s. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding OS features.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit faster CPU than Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little sharper display than Moto G60s, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher display density.
Motorola Moto G60s captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G60s also counts with a larger aperture and a way better resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G60s features just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Moto G60s has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.