Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, having a 90.8 score against 76. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter device than Motorola Moto G8 Power, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version and Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has a little larger display, a quite greater display density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a slightly better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a way lower resolution camera in the back, a lower video resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Moto G8 Power has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more than Moto G8 Power, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.