Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Moto G84, with a 90.8 score against 80.9. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version and Moto G84 has Android 13 version. Moto G84 counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE. Both have a display with the same size, a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE features a way better performance than Moto G84, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Moto G84 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light images, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor and a way better 50 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Moto G84 features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.