Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play's 76.7 global score. The Galaxy S20 FE is a a little lighter and a bit thinner phone than Motorola Moto G9 Play, even though both were only released with a couple of months difference. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 FE has a more recent 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a brighter display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Moto G9 Play counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture for better low light images and video and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.