Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Plus's score of 80.5. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's body is lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, although both were released only 1 months apart. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit more powerful processor than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a bit better display than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a quite greater pixels count per inch of screen.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a larger sensor.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G9 Plus has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.