Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is better than Moto G9 Power, having a global score of 90.8 against 78.6. The Galaxy S20 FE construction is lighter and thinner than the Moto G9 Power, even though both were released with only 2 months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version, providing some nice extra features and better performance.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher pixel density and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has slightly more storage to install games and applications than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE features just a little better processing power than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G9 Power shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has a way better resolution back camera.
Moto G9 Power features superior battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.