Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-02 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Galaxy S20 FE's body is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel density. Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit superior processor than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with much less megapixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy S20 FE has superior battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy S20 FE is a lot more expensive than Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.