Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a global score of 90.8 against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE body is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a larger screen and a quite better screen pixel density.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a bit better performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a way better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is way more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.