Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is much better than the Moto Z3's overall score of 77.6. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S20 FE's body is a lot newer than the Moto Z3's, although it's thicker and heavier.
Galaxy S20 FE features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little greater pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit superior processor than Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z3, because although it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Galaxy S20 FE has a much better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a way larger sensor shooting way better quality photos, better video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z3, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.