Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, with a score of 90.8 against 76.3. Galaxy S20 FE's design is incredibly newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a bit better looking display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little larger screen and a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video quality and a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and better 60 fps video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE costs a bit more money than the Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.