Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, with a general score of 90.8 against 81.6. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE design is thinner and lighter than Motorola One 5G Ace, even though both of them were released with only 3 months difference. Galaxy S20 FE features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a little more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a quite greater pixel density. The Motorola One 5G Ace shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a greater memory to install games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy S20 FE costs more money than the Motorola One 5G Ace, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.