Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is better than the Motorola One Vision, with a overall score of 90.8 against 80.7. The Galaxy S20 FE design is newer and just a bit thinner, but just a little heavier than the Motorola One Vision. The Motorola One Vision and Galaxy S20 FE count with quite similar displays, because although the Motorola One Vision has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2520px resolution and a just a little better number of pixels in each inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a little faster processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with greater battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 29% larger battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision takes slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and video and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.