Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2020), with a 90.8 score against 87. The Galaxy S20 FE body is just a bit thicker but a little lighter than Motorola razr (2020), and they were only released 0 months apart. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a just a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola razr (2020) has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light captures and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 61 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S20 FE is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.