Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola razr (2022)'s general score of 81.1. Even though Galaxy S20 FE is older and a little bit thicker than Motorola razr (2022), it's design is still a bit lighter. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 FE and Motorola razr (2022) both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Motorola razr (2022) has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola razr (2022) takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy S20 FE has greater battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.