Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 405 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a general score of 90.8 against 79.2. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The Galaxy S20 FE has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a way better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 4500mAh. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a much more mega-pixels camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.