Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy S20 FE's design is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a little sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a smaller sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.