Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 global score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives some additional features. Even when the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and OPPO Find X2 Pro were released only 5 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is just a bit thinner and just a little lighter.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a higher screen density, a little bit bigger display and a better 1440 x 3168px resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot higher resolution back camera, a much bigger sensor and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.