Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting a 90.8 score against 76. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, we must note that it's also a just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier cellphone. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 OS. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 6 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy S20 FE. Both have the same quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a same size screen and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The OPPO Find X3 Neo shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a way more mega pixels back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a battery lifetime that's very similar to the battery lifetime in Galaxy S20 FE.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.