Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | -- |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a 90.8 score against 77. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a a little bit heavier and a little thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 FE. They have a screen with the same size, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px and the same amount of pixels in each display inch.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE features a very superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.