Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-10-02 | -- |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a bit better than the Galaxy A34, getting a 90.8 score against 82.9. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version while Galaxy A34 has Android 13. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 FE features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A34, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A34, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a bigger back camera sensor. Galaxy A34 counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.