Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 score. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's construction is just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A35 5G, although it's just a bit thicker and was released 4 years before.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a much better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A35 5G features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Galaxy A35 5G takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.