Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit better than the Galaxy S20 FE, having a general score of 91.3 against 90.8. The Galaxy A52 5G is a just a little bit lighter device than Galaxy S20 FE, but both have the same thickness. Both phones we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Galaxy S20 FE has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S20 FE has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. Galaxy S20 FE features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the same pixel density and a screen of the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality photos and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G has a battery performance that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.