Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | -- |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | -- |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, having a score of 90.8 against 80.5. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has Android 12 version. Although it's the best we compare here, Galaxy S20 FE is a a little bit heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G.
Galaxy A73 5G features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A73 5G also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy A73 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A73 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy A73 5G counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, although it has a camera in the back with a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.