Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy F62's 88.1 score. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect. Even when the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and the Galaxy F62 were released only 5 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is thinner and somewhat lighter.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger number of cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy F62 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Galaxy F62 has a little bit better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.