Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-07-01 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is better than Samsung Galaxy M13's 81.1 global score. Galaxy S20 FE's construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy M13, but it is just a little bit lighter. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M13 has Android 12.
The Galaxy M13 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S20 FE, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy M13 has a little bit better screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2408 resolution and a quite larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M13, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy S20 FE shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy M13, although it has a camera with lot less megapixels resolution, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy M13 has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.