Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-04-07 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than the Galaxy M53 5G's 76.7 overall score. The Galaxy S20 FE is an older, thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than the Galaxy M53 5G. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version while Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy M53 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy M53 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a camera with a way lower 12 MP resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a way bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.