Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a 90.8 score against 80.4. The Galaxy S20 FE body is noticeably newer, but just a bit thicker and heavier than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 FE shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy S20 FE features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.