Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, getting a 90.8 score against 77.6. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is older than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's design is lighter and thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a just a bit better pixel amount per inch in the screen.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy S20 FE takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.