Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. Although Galaxy S20 FE and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released with a few months difference, Galaxy S20 FE is way lighter and thinner. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel density. The Galaxy S20 FE features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S20 FE features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a battery duration that is just as good as the battery life in Galaxy S20 FE.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy S20 FE is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.