Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having a 90.8 score against 81. These phones use the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy S20 FE's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even when they were released only a few months apart. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit lower pixels quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light situations and a camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is more expensive than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.