Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is slightly better than Galaxy Z Flip, with a 90.8 score against 88.5. Despite being the best phone we are comparing, the Galaxy S20 FE is a just a little heavier and thicker phone than the Galaxy Z Flip. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version and Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636, a just a bit better screen density and a quite bigger display. The Galaxy S20 FE has a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, a same resolution camera, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.