Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's overall score of 85.6. Although it's the best phone in this review, we must tell that it is also older, just a little bit heavier and thicker. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a processor that's just as good as the Galaxy S20 FE one, and although the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a little better number of pixels per screen inch, a quite better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy S20 FE shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both of them have a F1.8 aperture and a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S20 FE also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S20 FE is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.