Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Fold 3, with a global score of 90.8 against 90.6. These devices come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S20 FE is older and incredibly thicker than Galaxy Z Fold 3, it's design is still a lot lighter.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 FE features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy S20 FE shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.