Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting a 90.8 score against 79. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is heavier than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's much thinner and also extremely newer. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display. Galaxy S20 FE features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a little faster processing unit than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory. Xperia XZ2 Compact has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in low light environments and a much tinier sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a really longer battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.